Template:Did you know nominations/Savo Zlatić


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:04, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Savo Zlatić

 * ... that Savo Zlatić took up chess composition while imprisoned, using chess pieces made of bread?
 * Comment: QPQ review pending done: First impression (psychology).
 * Comment: QPQ review pending done: First impression (psychology).

Moved to mainspace by GregorB (talk). Self nominated at 21:34, 12 May 2014 (UTC).


 * Reviewing... hook length good, article long enough, new enough. QPQ done. Checking sources now Montanabw (talk) 00:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg The hook has three sources at the end of the paragraph, but this is a challenge to sort out which goes where, better to have the specific source for the hok at the end of each sentence that supports the hook. It's better form anyway. Place the footnotes accordingly and in the meantime, I'll check for close paraphrasing.   Montanabw (talk) 00:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I've added an appropriate inline ref to the hook-supporting sentence, as an exception. Since the article is mostly sourced to Stipančević, I feel that using inline refs after each sentence throughout the article would not be too helpful and that the article is currently in line with WP:CITE, although I'd be willing to reconsider, of course. GregorB (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol voting keep.svg Hook is now cited, though source is in Croatian and the link is to an abstract of the article.  Here, the DYK criteria, stricter than WP:CITE, trumps the general guideline. ;-) The two cites in English verify the material cited, though I'd prefer them to follow the awards they support.  But for DYK, it's good enough.  Good to go.  Montanabw (talk) 18:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)