Template:Did you know nominations/Secondary Mania


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 21:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Stale nomination

Secondary Mania

 * ... that besides physical trauma, secondary mania has been associated with caffeine consumption? Source: "(Ogawa, N., & Ueki 2003)"
 * ALT1:... that Secondary mania, also known as organic mania, is a variation of bipolar disorder that is caused by physical trauma or illness? Source: .(Krauthammer, 1978)

Created by Bwilli18 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:00, 26 April 2018 (UTC).




 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg I think it is important that an experienced, independent DYK reviewer check this, as both reviewer and nominator are new to DYK and to Wikipedia in general, and both appear to be taking the same class at Notre Dame. I should point out that reviews are supposed to state which hooks (if more than one) are approved, and as hooks with red links are not allowed, that would disqualify ALT1 as it currently stands. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Confirming that this nomination meets the DYK criteria of newness, length, cited hook, neutrality and absence of copyvios. Either hook could be used, but I favour ALT0, as the other is just a definition. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg I've pulled this from Prep due to the discussion at WT:DYK. Right now there's a big "Medref" template at the top of the article, as there are concerns about the sourcing in the article. This will need more eyes, particularly on the question of if ALT1 is a suitable alternative. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:52, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg The nominator has not edited since the day of the nomination (April 26), and other than minor copyedits and tagging, there has been no major edits to the article since creation. Considering the sourcing issues the article has right now, unless another editor is willing to adopt this nomination, it seems unlikely that the issues will be resolved anytime soon. As such, I regret to mark this for closure. Courtesy ping Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:41, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with closing this nomination. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I also agree that closure is the best option. What to do with the article is another question, but not one we need to answer here. Espresso Addict (talk) 12:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)