Template:Did you know nominations/Shackleton: Antarctic Odyssey


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:29, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Shackleton: Antarctic Odyssey

 * ... that Shackleton: Antarctic Odyssey was created for the 100th anniversary of the Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition of 1914?
 * Reviewed: I still have to review another nomination and will post this here once it's done.

Created by Kbeer1 (talk). Self nominated at 19:42, 15 October 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg I was just about to review this nomination when I saw that the QPQ review had not yet been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Ping! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg This is Kbeer1's first DYK nom so QPQ isn't required.  A pretty good article. but word count is only 718 words of prose, less than half the 1,500 word requirement.  Sorry, Characters, not words (grumble). Continuing to check. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) WER 17:59, 14 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg The length requirement is 1500B not 1500 words and this article is amply long enough as well as being new enough, and its a very nice article too. The article is neutral and I did not detect any close paraphrasing issues. You do not need to review another nomination until your 6th DYK. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New enough (created 8 Oct, nom'ed 15 Oct; barely made it).✅  Long enough (over 4k characters).✅ Neutral POV.✅ Reliable sources supported by in-line citations of reliable sources.✅ Checked for problems with close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism with half a dozen Google searches of phrases enclosed in quotes; all returned only to this article.✅ QPQ not needed because it is first DYK self-nom.✅  Hook is interesting✅ but cited source does not support that the book was published for the 100th anniversary.❌ Hook should be reworded, perhaps  proposed Alt_1 (156 characters) or Alt_2 (162 characters)? DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) WER 19:39, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * ALT 1 ... that Shackleton: Antarctic Odyssey was published just before the 100th anniversary of the Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition of 1914 on which it was based?
 * ALT 2 ... that Shackleton: Antarctic Odyssey was released during the 100th anniversary year of the Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition of 1914 on which the novel was based?
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Reconfirming my approval of this article. I had the same doubt as Doctree about the original hook and had intended (though I see I did not do so) to change the "created for" in the original hook to "released in time for". I was distracted by being edit conflicted during the review. I have now struck the original hook and approve ALT1 and ALT2, either of which could be used. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:47, 16 November 2014 (UTC)