Template:Did you know nominations/Sideways (comics)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Sideways (comics)

 * ... that new Puerto Rican comic character Sideways was co-created by Puerto Rican artist Kenneth Rocafort? Source
 * ALT1:... that the first issue of the comic book Sideways featured a vertical Gatefold cover? Source
 * Reviewed: No Straight Lines / Template:Did you know nominations/No Straight Lines

Created by Bjones (talk) and Argento Surfer (talk). Nominated by Argento Surfer (talk) at 16:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC).


 * Review:


 * I removed the stub tag. The article is larger than the various minimums listed at WP:STUB (Ten sentences, 250 words, and 1500 characters). I also divided it into sections.
 * Why does the reference need to be split? I've done that on numerous GA articles and have never been told such.
 * The citation for Alt 1 was located at the end of the second sentence following the claim, since it supported all three sentences. I've duplicated it directly after the claim. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The reference should be split so you know which one is being used. This also allows the references to be used elsewhere in the article without any confusion as to which one is being used. Having two different articles referenced in the same footnote is kludgy and a bit lazy, too. Thanks for splitting it. The article looks much better with the sections. Everything looks good to go! ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 16:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The reference should be split so you know which one is being used. This also allows the references to be used elsewhere in the article without any confusion as to which one is being used. Having two different articles referenced in the same footnote is kludgy and a bit lazy, too. Thanks for splitting it. The article looks much better with the sections. Everything looks good to go! ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 16:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)