Template:Did you know nominations/Sir Cusack Patrick Roney


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Sir Cusack Patrick Roney

 * ... that Sir Cusack Patrick Roney (pictured) was knighted for his role as secretary to the Dublin Great Industrial Exhibition of 1853?
 * Alt1... that in 1855, Sir Cusack Patrick Roney (pictured) predicted that the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada "cannot fail to prove a highly profitable enterprize"?
 * Reviewed: Anastasia Soare

Created by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 11:58, 31 July 2018 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg The article is new and long enough. It is neutral and cites sources inline. Earwig's Copyvio Detector reports no copyvio issues. I prefer the ALT1-hook, which needs to be expanded maybe as "... predicted in a report with two others that the ..." to be conform with the original text. The hook would be within limit also in this case. The image is included in the article, and is ©-free. QPQ was done by the creator Whispyhistory. However, to my knowledge, the nominator has to do QPQ. CeeGee 12:42, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, the quote is directly from Roney in the part that he wrote. Please view the ref. It's immediately before "Your very obedient servant, C. P. Roney". Anyone can do the QPQ. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:55, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * OK! It was not clear to me as I could not read the whole source tetx. Forget my recommendation about an extended ALT. However, I am not convinced with your statement "anyone can do the QPQ". Maybe a more experienced WPan can help here. After this issue is resolved, I can approve. Sorry for any delay. CeeGee 13:41, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * CeeGee, anyone is welcome to donate an unused review of theirs as a QPQ; in this case, it's the article's co-creator doing the donating, which is the most common case, and perfectly fine for DYK. So long as the donated review covers all the DYK criteria, it should be fine. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:35, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much indeed BlueMoonset. This was the information I needed to know. CeeGee 13:27, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Symbol voting keep.svg OK. Everything is fine now. Good to go. Sorry for the delay. CeeGee 13:27, 14 August 2018 (UTC)