Template:Did you know nominations/Solo (EP)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 19:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Solo (EP)

 * ... that medium pop and R&B "Crying" is Heo Young-saeng's lead track in his 2012 EP Solo despite wanting to do light rock?


 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Block Island Wind Farm

5x expanded by 001Jrm (talk). Self-nominated at 05:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC).


 * This hook needs fixing. What is medium pop? Is the word song supposed to be after R&B? Young-saeng, not "Crying", should be the subject of "wanting to do light rock". hinnk (talk) 05:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I based "medium pop" from this Korean article and this English article, but I guess the better translation would be "medium-tempo pop" just like what this article stated..? I also rearranged the hook into this:
 * ALT1: ... that Heo Young-saeng wanted to do light rock but he was given a medium-tempo pop and R&B lead track for his 2012 EP Solo instead?
 * Let me know if it needs more fixing. Thanks for pointing those out! :) 001Jrm (talk) 20:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed; original hook struck as problematic. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg As far as I can see, Heo chose to perform the song rather than being "given" it. What about a completely different hook


 * ALT2 ... that the lyrics for "Crying", the lead track on Heo Young-saeng's 2012 EP Solo, were written by Heo himself? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:18, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg I gave the article a thorough copyedit, removing the fancruft. The ALT2 by User:Cwmhiraeth is definitely better than the original. Here is a complete review: 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, well referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. ALT2 hook ref verified and cited inline. QPQ done. ALT1 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 19:34, 23 July 2015 (UTC)