Template:Did you know nominations/Sphecomyrminae

Sphecomyrminae

 * ... that the cretaceous subfamily Sphecomyrminae has not been included in several recent phylogenetic studies of the ant family?
 * Reviewed: Boletinellus merulioides
 * Comment: Reviewed Boletus illudens as part of the Template:Did you know nominations/Boletinellus merulioides multinomination

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self nominated at 17:47, 10 May 2013 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article size and date of creation fine. Hook fact is interesting, cited in the article and verified in online paper. The underlying message is that "the Sphecomyrminae is important and should be included in future studies of the ant family". Maybe someone with firsthand knowledge of English could double check whether this is clear enough. Oceanh (talk) 17:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article size and date of creation fine. Hook fact is interesting, cited in the article and verified in online paper. The underlying message is that "the Sphecomyrminae is important and should be included in future studies of the ant family". Maybe someone with firsthand knowledge of English could double check whether this is clear enough. Oceanh (talk) 17:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)