Template:Did you know nominations/Star Airlines


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 08:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Article far too short for DYK; no edits made to address the many issues raised

Star Airlines‎

 * ... that why Chang Yung-fa's son Chang Kuo-wei need to launch a new carrier company?
 * ALT1:... that Star Airlines is the new carrier company which launched by the former vice president of Evergreen Group?

Created by Sdee (talk). Self-nominated at 14:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol delete vote.svg I am sorry to say that this nomination has major obstacles to overcome if it is to be accepted, including:
 * the article is too short, under 1000 characters and thus well under the 1500 character minimum.
 * the article is about an airline that is not expected to operate for at least another year, so is problematic in a policy sense. I am not convinced that notability has been established.
 * the article is classified as Start class, an assessment made by an editor other than the nominator, but it looks like a Stub to me.
 * the article needs a copyedit, the English is not of a sufficient standard.
 * I do not understand what ALT0 is saying.
 * ALT1 is not very interesting. The facts in the article, that the founder inherited the leadership of Evergreen but left to start his own business instead is a much better basis for a hook, I think.
 * Nominator already has 6 DYK creditsand so a QPQ review is required.
 * The article is not new, Sdee has changed it from a redirect, which means that the above "Created by" is wrong - though this is easily fixed. The nomination was made on time so it is eligible on that front.
 * No copyvio issues and close paraphrasing is highly unlikely given the problems with written English.
 * Sdee, in its present state, this article is far from being ready for DYK and the main page. It needs more content, a copyedit, an improved / clarified hook, a QPQ review of another nomination is needed, and notability is questionable, in my view.  Foreign-language sources are fine but translations of titles would be helpful.  EdChem (talk) 15:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)