Template:Did you know nominations/Stephanie Hansen; Delaware's 10th state senate district special election, 2017


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Stephanie Hansen, Delaware's 10th state senate district special election, 2017

 * ... that Joe Biden went door-to-door with Stephanie Hansen to help her win a recent special election to the Delaware Senate? "Joe Biden Campaigns for Delaware Candidate in Crucial State Senate Race", The New York Times; February 22, 2017. "Mr. Biden has raised money for Stephanie Hansen, the Democratic nominee in a State Senate contest this Saturday, and appeared in her radio ads and knocked on doors alongside her."
 * ALT1:... that Stephanie Hansen spent a million dollars to win a recent special election to the Delaware Senate, setting a new record for a state legislative race? "Delaware special election spending nears $1 million", News Journal, February 21, 2017; "Democrats are poised to spend a record-shattering $1 million."
 * Reviewed: Byzantine (video game)
 * Comment: For once this one is not time-sensitive. I (Daniel) will be doing some more work on both these articles after making this nomination, so we don't need to rush,

Created by Daniel Case (talk) and Socrates Burrito (talk). Nominated by Daniel Case (talk) at 19:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg - Length, Date, Cite, QPQ (one done by Daniel, the other author appears to have no prior credits and is thus exempt), and Earwigs check. Both hooks approved.  Mifter (talk) 21:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg As Daniel Case is the nominator of both articles, two QPQs need to be supplied. It doesn't matter who wrote what, but rather who nominated. I'm also not entirely sure that the one review submitted would count, since a full review was never done, but I'll leave that determination up to Mifter. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:07, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I was thinking of doing one anyway. Will report back when I've done it. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have reviewed Subramanian Kalyanaraman. Daniel Case (talk) 07:47, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

- Thanks. I'm also not too worried about the other review as someone has to handle the stragglers/noms that nobody else wants, in some ways its easier to find a straightforward nom than one with issues. Daniel is a regular and I fully trust that he is acting in good faith and that he isn't out to game the system. Best, Mifter (talk) 01:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)