Template:Did you know nominations/Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act

 * ... that the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act has been criticized for its proposed weakening of the Section 230 safe harbors?  https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/1/16072680/cda-230-stop-enabling-sex-traffickers-act-liability-shield-senate-backpage
 * ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
 * Reviewed: S. Sashikanth

Created by ViperSnake151 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. Should the hook include mention that this is a US law? And what about including the word "proposed" as it hasn't been enacted yet? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but note that no other Wikipedia articles link to it. Could you add one or more so it doesn't need an orphan tag? Also, the QPQ looks more like you commented on the nomination rather than gave it a full review. Yoninah (talk) 18:38, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I not only reviewed it but actually did some copyediting to address my specific concerns. Plus, where exactly would you link this? ViperSnake151   Talk  19:05, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * OK on the QPQ. Is there an article on US legal cases in 2017? Or a see also in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act? Yoninah (talk) 19:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg It is mentioned in Sex trafficking in the United States, where I have now linked it. Restoring tick now that it's not an orphan, but, please feel free to add it to anywhere else appropriate, such as suggested above. --Usernameunique (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2017 (UTC)