Template:Did you know nominations/Su Bingqi


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Su Bingqi

 * ... that Su Bingqi (pictured) was regarded as the paramount authority in Chinese archaeology? Source: The Archaeology of China, p. 7, Encyclopedia of Archaeology, p. 591
 * Reviewed: Treaty of Livadia

Moved to mainspace by Zanhe (talk). Self-nominated at 19:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Image is OK. Article is new enough, long enough. Hook is verified (though not very exciting--a more exciting hook is found, maybe, in his introduction of that multi-regional model) (and I wonder if "was" is the proper verb tense to use, given the source). But there is too much close paraphrasing; much of it is passable, maybe, but parts of the last paragraph (look for "synthesizes") really need to be either rephrased or just cited directly. Drmies (talk) 20:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your review. I've edited the last paragraph a bit more, and it's quite thoroughly paraphrased in my view. I don't know what else could be done other than directly quoting entire sentences or deleting them. As for the hook, How about ALT1:
 * ALT1 ... that Su Bingqi (pictured), China's paramount archaeologist, proposed a "heretical" multi-region model for prehistoric China which rejected the traditional view that Chinese civilization radiated from the Central Plain?
 * -Zanhe (talk) 05:39, 2 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg ALT1 is fine. Drmies (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2018 (UTC)