Template:Did you know nominations/Susan Hanson (geographer)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:18, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Susan Hanson (geographer)

 * ... that, in 2000, Susan Hanson became the first female geographer to be elected to both the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences?


 * Reviewed: Ecuadorian cacique

Created by Cordless Larry (talk). Self-nominated at 07:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg New and long enough, the article has at least 1 inline citation per para. No POV or plagiarism detected. QPQ provided. The hook fact is interesting and cited to a Google Books page from the Encyclopedia of Geography published by Sage publishers. All the sources are reliable enough. Good to Go. --Skr15081997 (talk) 11:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Yes, this is a start-class article, but aside from the two quotes, it does not give a good indication as to why she is notable. Footnote 1 mentions the number of books and papers she's written, which should be included, but something should be said about her 45+ years in the field. A bibliography section should also be added, at least for her 7 books. Yoninah (talk) 14:52, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi . Notability guidelines for academics are listed at WP:NACADEMIC. The article documents that Hanson has won multiple national awards (criterion 2), that she's an elected member of highly selective and prestigious scholarly societies (not to mention the first female geographer to be so) (criterion 3), that she holds a distinguished professor appointment (criterion 5), that she's been the president of a major academic society (criterion 6), and that she's been the editor of several major journals (criterion 8). Together, that seems like a good indication of why she is notable to me! Cordless Larry (talk) 16:21, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg OK, thanks. Restoring tick per Skr15081997's review. Yoninah (talk) 20:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)