Template:Did you know nominations/Suzanne Sjögren


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Suzanne Sjögren

 * ... that television presenter Suzanne Sjögren (pictured) participated in and won a celebrity edition of the show Singing Bee?
 * ALT1:... that television presenter Suzanne Sjögren (pictured)  was elected as Sweden's sexiest woman by the men magazine Slitz in 2001


 * Reviewed: Runnin' (Lose It All)

Created by BabbaQ (talk). Self-nominated at 20:56, 6 October 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg The article is new, neutral, uses inline citations, and is the proper length at 1,618 characters of prose. Both hooks are below 200 characters. Both are verified, although the second is verified by an English translation of the original Swedish webpage by Google Translate.  The image is free use as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0.William S. Saturn (talk) 22:19, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I hope that the ALT1 hook is used. And the image. That would generate quite a few hits.BabbaQ (talk) 10:12, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg The prose portion of this article is below the 1500 character minimum., I have noticed that at least three of your recent DYK submissions were below the minimum length requirement. Please make sure future nominations are at least 1500 characters long before you submit them. Thanks, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg My mistake -- with spaces this is actually 1577 characters. My apologies for causing any confusion. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, that is alright. I agree with you anyway that I could expand some articles. For sure. Thank you!BabbaQ (talk) 19:54, 18 October 2015 (UTC)