Template:Did you know nominations/Tax status of Scientology in the United States


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by   HalfGig   talk  12:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Tax status of Scientology in the United States

 * ... that the Church of Scientology (former Los Angeles headquarters pictured) used espionage, front groups, private detectives, and over 2,500 lawsuits to gain tax exemption in the United States?
 * Reviewed: Werde munter, mein Gemüte

Created by Prioryman (talk). Self-nominated at 15:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg The article passes DYK criteria in neutrality, reliable sources, and length. The article was originally a sandbox moved to main space on March 4, and thus it is eligible based on amount of time. QPQ is done. The problem I have is that I'm not sure about the claim about them using private detectives. In the only place mentioning private detectives ("The smell of police or private detectives caused them to fly, to close down, to confess"). I can't tell for sure if it is referring to them being used by Scientologists. Also, I added a comma to the hook--12george1 (talk) 02:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you see the problem as being? There's an entire subsection about the use of private investigators. The line you quote is from part of that section, which sets out the reasons for using PIs against perceived enemies. The next three paragraphs describe how PIs were used against the IRS. Prioryman (talk) 22:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Oh, never mind. Scratch that. I did a search for only "private detective". Now I look like an idiot. I have no issues with the article otherwise and I'll say it's good to go--12george1 (talk) 04:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)