Template:Did you know nominations/Televisa Radio


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Televisa Radio

 * ... that Televisa Radio attempted to merge with two of its principal competitors in 2000, only to have both deals fall through?


 * Reviewed: Dave Albright
 * Comment: Most—but not all—sources in Spanish.

5x expanded by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 03:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg The article doesn't exactly say Grupo Radio Centro and Grupo ACIR were two of Televisa's principal competitors. Can you add that to the article? Also, I think a reference snould be added to the end of "acquisition failed due to marketplace concerns". Random86 (talk) 05:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I've made all the suggested wording changes, and this:
 * ALT1: ... that Televisa Radio attempted to merge with two of its principal competitors in 2000, only to have both acquisition bids fail? Raymie (t • c) 06:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * And I misread what you said, whoops! Raymie (t • c) 06:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Article has been sufficiently expanded and is long enough. It is neutral and has inline citations. Most sources are offline and/or in Spanish, so I cannot check for plagiarism. Hooks are interesting and neutral (AGF on offline sources). QPQ done. Both hooks are good to go! Random86 (talk) 06:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Citations are needed for the fact that each of the stations were "major competitors". Yoninah (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * While I've added some for that, they too are offline sources. I've put in some hidden comments in each of the refs mentioning the particular words used in the article. I hope that's satisfying. Raymie (t • c) 01:10, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Yes, thank you. Restoring tick per Random86's review. Yoninah (talk) 15:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)