Template:Did you know nominations/Ten Talents (cookbook)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Ten Talents (cookbook)

 * ... that when it was published in 1968 Ten Talents was one of the only vegan cookbooks? Source: "these are the two vegan cookbooks...in the 1970s" and "one of the only resources for vegetarian cooks in the late 60s"
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Harlow Hill Cemetery

Created by Valereee (talk). Self-nominated at 16:42, 18 February 2019 (UTC).


 * Comment: "one of the only"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)


 * yeah, not thrilled with the wording either. One of the sources says one of two she could find, the other says one of the only but doesn't state a number. Another says one of the few, also doesn't state a number. I wasn't sure how to word it that would make it clear but not overstate it valereee (talk) 18:57, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * In the body, I read "one of the only two" which makes sense. I'd quote something else from the many good "reception" quotes, in both lead and hook. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:33, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * ALT1: ... that the title of the 1968 vegetarian-vegan cookbook Ten Talents references a parable by Jesus? Yoninah (talk) 22:15, 18 February 2019 (UTC)


 * ALT2:... that in 2017, the nearly 50-year-old Ten Talents was called one of three must-have classic vegetarian cookbooks? Source: "three must-have classic vegetarian cookbooks" valereee (talk) 10:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg ALT2, a bit reluctantly, but the best we have so far, - please keep polishing. Someone will ask "who (called)?" I like the connection to present-day importance. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Yeah, not thrilled with that one, either. The explanation of 'who called' is 'Washington Post Food Editor Joe Yonan' -- do you think that makes it unwieldy? ... that in 2017, Washington Post Food Editor Joe Yonan called the nearly 50-year-old Ten Talents one of three must-have classic vegetarian cookbooks? valereee (talk) 19:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)


 * How is this?
 * ALT2b: ... that the 1968 Ten Talents is one of three must-have classic vegetarian cookbooks, according to a food editor of the Washington Post?
 * Symbol confirmed.svg that one also. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Works for me! valereee (talk) 23:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but the hook smacks of WP:ADVERTISING. Yoninah (talk) 21:22, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * of a 1968 book? - says something about those written later ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If it's a must-have classic vegetarian cookbook, then I must buy it, right? Yoninah (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * "If" you want any classic, yes, which limits it considerably, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:15, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * , and if you want a classic vegetarian cookbook, which limits it even further lol valereee (talk) 11:28, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Frankly, I don't know why you approved the article when it was mostly reviews. I have gone ahead and expanded it with reliable sources, and added myself to the co-creation credits. I'll suggest these alts, or maybe has something else in mind:
 * ALT3: ... that Ten Talents, a 50-year-old vegetarian and vegan cookbook that is still in print, was the first to feature recipes for soy milk ice cream shakes?
 * ALT4: ... that Ten Talents, a 1968 whole food cookbook promoting Christian vegetarianism, has just one chapter on milk and eggs "for those who are in the transitional period"? Yoninah (talk) 23:57, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, would like to hear what the author thinks. I miss a year in ALT4. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * , I didn't include the year because it's still in print. But I added it now. Yoninah (talk) 17:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg ALT3 and ALT4, with a slight preference for ALT4. If valereee has a better idea, I am open. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:46, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Either one works for me, mild preference for ALT3. I was under the impression putting an article up for DYK before it was very good was an acceptable strategy for getting more eyes on it? I had included every source I could find and hoped others might find sources I hadn't found to expand the article. valereee (talk) 11:28, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * yes, it's fine to write a start-class article. But when most of the article is reviews, with very little about the content of the book, it's not considered start-class. Yoninah (talk) 13:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)