Template:Did you know nominations/Tennant Creek Catholic Church


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 22:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Closing per nominator

Tennant Creek Catholic Church

 * that the Tennant Creek Catholic Church, once known as the "longest church" in Australia, was over 700 kilometres long? Source: The church building was originally constructed in 1904 in Pine Creek, which is 760 km north of Tennant Creek... The dismantled church was railed to Birdum and then trucked the remaining distance. The trucks carrying the dismantled church were caught in floods at Daly Waters and parts of the loads were left on the roadside. Spread out along the route for some time, it became known as the "longest church in Australia".
 * ALT1: that the Tennant Creek Catholic Church, once known as the "longest church" in Australia had its ends, over 700 kilometres apart? Source: The church building was originally constructed in 1904 in Pine Creek, which is 760 km north of Tennant Creek... The dismantled church was railed to Birdum and then trucked the remaining distance. The trucks carrying the dismantled church were caught in floods at Daly Waters and parts of the loads were left on the roadside. Spread out along the route for some time, it became known as the "longest church in Australia".
 * Reviewed: Alfred Lionel Rose

Created by Tenniscourtisland (talk). Self-nominated at 03:54, 16 October 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough, no close paraphrasing or neutrality issues detected. However, the hooks do not exist in the article especially the "over 700 kilometres long". And the source used here are not sourced but explanatory footnotes also not in the article. I suggest incorporating an inline citations for the dimensions or suggesting another more simpler hook like... that the Tennant Creek Catholic Church, once known as the "longest church" in Australia. KAVEBEAR (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg article new enough, long enough, references checks out. good 2 go.BabbaQ (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg BabbaQ, nothing has changed in the article, yet you have passed it despite the issues KAVEBEAR originally noted with the hooks. The point there, that nowhere does the article say that the church was actually spread out over more than 700 kilometres, still seems accurate. Hooks need to be clearly backed up by the article, and KAVEBEAR's right: this one isn't. The problem here is that the nominator, Tenniscourtisland, has not responded to these points in over a month. BlueMoonset (talk) 08:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol delete vote.svg I have just checked Tenniscourtisland's talk page, and the notification of the issues from the original review was removed from said page on November 20. There has been a single spate of edits by the nominator on December 10, at which time the November 30 ping would have been seen. I have to assume there is no intention to address the issues raised with the hook, so I'm marking this for closure. If the nominator returns before this closes and does address the issues, the review can always continue, but the nomination is now two months old, and has been waiting for action long enough. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:08, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi all. Sorry for the slow reply. Haven't been editing much lately. No problems about closing the nomination. I don't have time to seek addition sources for this page at the moment. They're hard to find and I've used all I have for that page. So go ahead and close. Thanks. Tenniscourtisland (talk) 08:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC)