Template:Did you know nominations/The Captive Slave


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 22:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

The Captive Slave

 * ... that the heroic, antislavery painting The Captive Slave (pictured) was not seen in public for 180 years?

Created by Alanscottwalker (talk). Self nominated at 14:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC).


 * This is just the start of my review (hence no tick mark yet). New enough, long enough, suitably referenced. I have italicised both the article title and "(pictured)" in the hook. More later.  Schwede 66  19:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Second half of the review. I've run the online references through the Duplication Detector and references 2, 4, and 5 came out clean. Reference 1 is a jpg and I didn't manage to convert this through OCR to something that resulted in meaningful text, so I shall assume good faith on that one. I have removed a category redlink as per WP:CAT. The hook facts check out, including "heroic", "antislavery", and "180 years". QPQ check reveals six previous credits, so a QPQ is required before this can go any further. Once that's done, I shall state that this is a good piece of work suitable for the lead hook.  Schwede 66  08:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Reviewed:Template:Did you know nominations/The Goblin Emperor. : Thank you. Alanscottwalker (talk) 01:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go. And just to keep this statement at the bottom: this is a good piece of work suitable for the lead hook.  Schwede 66  03:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)