Template:Did you know nominations/The Clan (2015 film)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 17:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination added to double hook at Template:Did you know nominations/Puccio family

The Clan (2015 film)

 * ... that the Argentine film The Clan, based on the activities of a kidnapping ring, was written with input from relatives of its victims?
 * Reviewed: Pachycondyla eocenica

5x expanded by Ariloc (talk) and Maximilianoc (talk). Nominated by Cambalachero (talk) at 13:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Hasn't been 5x expanded in the qualifying period; the plot section, that makes up most of the article, is cited to a source that only supports the first sentence; no QPQ listed. Belle (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Prose size of 201 B as of August 14 (see here). Prose size of 1952 as of August 25 (see here). There is no QPQ because I'm nominating an article that was, for the most part, expanded by other users. Cambalachero (talk) 12:34, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Ok, I see the reduction in size was due to a copyvio removal, so that's fine for the 5x expansion; QPQ is still required for non-self-noms as the rules were changed in November last year. Belle (talk) 12:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Done Cambalachero (talk) 16:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The uncited plot problem remains. Belle (talk) 10:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * See MOS:PLOT, plot sections do not really need to be referenced, as the source is the plot itself of the film. Cambalachero (talk) 12:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg The article is referenced, neutral and with no close paraphrasing. Hook is interesting & verified through online sources. QPQ done. Good to go to me! FrogmanOfTheSahara (talk) 01:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg This green-tick "Pass" is in doubt.  It is part of a series of 15 (as of this posting) green-tick "Pass" done within minutes of each other several days in September. Please see WT:DYK. — Maile  (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg This is fine; the only remaining problem was that the plot summary was partially cited when we prefer it not to be cited at all; go figure. New enough, long enough, QPQ done; no copyvio or other text crimes; hook interesting enough and cited; neutral. Belle (talk) 21:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg are you interested in combining this nomination with Template:Did you know nominations/Puccio family for a double hook? Yoninah (talk) 13:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, it seems a good idea. I suggest to archive this proposal, and deal with the joint proposal at that other page. Cambalachero (talk) 13:27, 10 September 2015 (UTC)