Template:Did you know nominations/The Oval Gasholders


 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 10:30, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

The Oval Gasholders

 * ... that development of The Oval was objected to because of fears that The Oval Gasholders (pictured) might explode?
 * Reviewed: America Online, Inc. v. IMS

Created by The C of E (talk). Self nominated at 15:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Article is new enough and long enough. It is suitably written and spot checks raise no concerns re plagiarism or close paraphrasing. The image is suitably licenced. The hook is interesting, however the reference used to support it just says the HSE has objected to the proposed development and that there will be an inquiry, it doesn't say the development "was prevented". Could another source be found to support this?&mdash; Rod talk 12:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I've reworded the hook.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 09:03, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg OK I think the new wording is supported by the source (however I see here that the objection was ultimately over ruled, which could be added to the article.&mdash; Rod talk 09:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)