Template:Did you know nominations/Theingapati


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Theingapati

 * ... that Crown Prince Theingapati and his father King Kyawswa of Pagan were branded traitors and executed in 1299 by the Myinsaing brothers for their submission to the Mongol Empire?


 * Reviewed: Embodied bilingual language

Created by Hybernator (talk). Self-nominated at 16:00, 25 May 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Can anyone source the introduction section? The hook is fine and fewer than 200 characters. The article is Long and new enough as at the time of nomination but the article's introduction section needs sourcing. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Wikic¤l¤gy, thanks for the review. The citations for the hook and the intro were in the body but I've just added them to the lede as well. Please review. Thanks. Hybernator (talk) 14:19, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I really do not have any concern about the article at the moment but I will allow other editors to also review it perhaps they might see what I don't see. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 18:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed to recheck article and hook: I don't see mention of neutrality in either or checks for close paraphrasing in original review. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:31, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg New enough, long enough, well referenced. As all the sources are either offline or foreign-language, unable to check for close paraphrasing. However, the article maintains a neutral tone. Offline hook refs AGF and cited inline. There is no reason to add cites to the lede, as it is not controversial information and is cited later in the text; you could remove those cites if you like. QPQ done. I tweaked the grammar in the hook. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 20:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)