Template:Did you know nominations/Tintin in Tibet


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 17:50, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Tintin in Tibet

 * ... that Tintin in Tibet is the only Tintin story without an antagonist?
 * Reviewed: Put here

Improved to Good Article status by Matty.007 (talk), Prhartcom (talk). Nominated by Matty.007 (talk) at 11:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Couple things. No QPQ yet, and the hook fact isn't actually cited in the article text (it's in a footnote, which is not the same thing; furthermore, if something's in the lede it generally is central enough to include in the body). Otherwise looks quite good. Referencing is thorough. GA review is recent enough. I'll have to AGF on the hook fact as the book doesn't seem to have preview mode here. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:28, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Apologies for my error as I don't often cite books: the note says Tintin in Tibet is the only Tintin adventure without an antagonist. "Even The Castafiore Emerald has a culpable magpie."[8] has a ref after it, and inline at but kept the idea of an adventure with no guns, violence, or antagonist.[7]. Is there a sourcing error with it? Thanks, Mat  ty  .  007  17:26, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The only issue is the placement of the hook fact, which is in a footnote (i.e. not in the body of the text). If you were able to merge it smoothly into the actual text, and provide a QPQ, this would be good to go. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:24, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * It is in the first paragraph of 'Background and early ideas', but kept the idea of an adventure with no guns, violence, or antagonist.[7][a]. QPQ coming today... Thanks, Mat  ty  .  007  08:50, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Problem is, your hook fact is not that it had no antagonist, but that it was the only Tintin work to have no antagonist. That is in a footnote. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:51, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my mistake. Changed. Thanks, Mat  ty  .  007  10:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Great. Just waiting for a QPQ now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:06, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * doing Template:Did you know nominations/Luther Kaltenbach. Thanks, Mat  ty  .  007  14:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Alright, I'll wait for it to develop a bit more. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:27, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * OK. You watching it or do you want updates here? Thanks, Mat  ty  .  007  14:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Watching. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:50, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Good, QPQ is going swimmingly, everything else is checked out. Good to go! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:43, 27 May 2014 (UTC)