Template:Did you know nominations/Trout Creek (Monument Creek)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Trout Creek (Monument Creek)

 * ... that the surficial geology in the vicinity of Trout Creek includes bedrock, Wisconsinan Till, alluvium, fill, wetlands, and lakes?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Carmen de Burgos

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 02:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg solid information on good sources, not too exciting, nor is the hook. What do you think of saying something about the wild trout in the Trout creek? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * You mean something like ... that there are trout in Trout Creek? In terms of reader interest, it could either be a good hook (as in, hmm...there must be something I'm missing) or a terrible one (as in, well, obviously). ALT0 is probably somewhere in between, in my opinion. There's a lot of stuff in it, and some of it might sound enticingly curious to the layperson. --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec  23:39, 16 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I rather thought of the article line
 * ALT1: ... that wild trout naturally reproduce in Trout Creek from its headwaters to its mouth?
 * but I can't approve my own hook even if it's yours. So I
 * Symbol confirmed.svg approve the original and predict not too many clicks, but you taught something to the few attracted ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)