Template:Did you know nominations/Typhlops meszoelyi


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  FITINDIA   16:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Typhlops meszoelyi

 * ... that the specimen from which the blind snake Typhlops meszoelyi was described had a diameter of 3 mm?
 * Reviewed: Philip Davey

5x expanded by Vanamonde93 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:38, 26 July 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol possible vote.svg It's great to see an 11-year-old article finally (almost) reach DYK eligibility! Article is newly expanded (July 25), long enough (1,800 characters), well-cited throughout, neutral,  nothing concerning in the copyvio detector and no close paraphrasing observed skimming some of the literature. Hook is interesting, mentioned in article, and cited to and in ref 3 (Wallach 1999). QPQ looks good. The hook fact, which is in Wallach 1999, needs a citation directly after the sentence in which the hook fact is mentioned, per dyk rules. Other than that, good to go!  Bob Amnertiopsis ∴ChatMe! 19:13, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. I've duplicated the reference, as you requested. Vanamonde (talk) 04:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Thanks. It's not my favorite rule but it makes sense in context. Good to go! Bob Amnertiopsis ∴ChatMe! 04:41, 28 July 2017 (UTC)