Template:Did you know nominations/University of Farmington


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

University of Farmington

 * ... that University of Farmington (pictured) was a fake university set up by the United States Department of Homeland Security, as a part of an undercover operation to expose immigration fraud? Source: "The university in the suburbs of Detroit was part of an undercover operation by the Department of Homeland Security designed to expose immigration fraud" (New York Times

Created by DiplomatTesterMan (talk) and DBigXray (talk). Nominated by DBigXray (talk) at 13:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC).


 * I moved the article and updated the link above to avoid the redirect. Widefox ; talk 12:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Reviewing- &#x222F; WBG converse 16:40, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * DBX, can you point to your QPQ-work? &#x222F; WBG converse 20:13, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * wut ?  D Big X ray ᗙ  20:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * OK, I figured out from WP:DYKRULES that QPQ meant " quid pro quo", I have only 2 DYK credits so far, so I am exempt (since <5). But FWIW, I have recently reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Death of Mohammad Habali.  D Big X ray ᗙ  06:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I ought to have spelt it out clearly.
 * Please add the technical details (exact visa-types et al) from this and other sources. There have been further recent developments. &#x222F; WBG converse 12:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi WBG, with all due respect, this is not a GA review, there is no Did_you_know for the article to be completely upto date with every minor piece of information that gets published daily. Myself or someone else will certainly add this visa information or any other information that is published in the upcoming days, in the normal editing cycle. But this should not be a reason for holding the DYK approval. The article passes 1,500 character limit for long enough criteria and passes all other DYK criterias as is needed.  D Big X ray ᗙ  12:29, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't like pushing half-baked stuff but then, your points are valid enough. Doing the review:-) &#x222F; WBG converse 12:32, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Haha, This cake will be on the oven for the next few months, we will have enough time to keep baking it again and again.  D Big X ray ᗙ  12:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Haha, This cake will be on the oven for the next few months, we will have enough time to keep baking it again and again.  D Big X ray ᗙ  12:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg- &#x222F; WBG converse 12:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Whilst the hook and article-quality is good enough, I am as to whether the university logo can qualify as a picture of the university. Whoever closes this; please note. &#x222F; WBG converse 12:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Winged Blades of Godric, AFAICS all the criteria of the WP:DYKIMG are met in this case. For the benefit of the closer, can you clarify the hesitation ?  D Big X ray ᗙ  13:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Nothing serious. I was sparing some thoughts about whether it shall be (pictured, logo of the university) and left such thoughts to the discretion of the closer. &#x222F; WBG converse 13:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok, I think the logo itself is the representation and the standard word (pictured) is sufficient. Thanks for clarifying. regards.  D Big X ray ᗙ  13:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)