Template:Did you know nominations/Val-d'Oise


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Val-d'Oise, L'Isle-Adam, Val-d'Oise

 * ... that L'Isle-Adam is a picturesque town with a beach beside the River Oise in Val-d'Oise?


 * ALT1:... that L'Isle-Adam is a commune beside the River Oise in Val-d'Oise?
 * Reviewed: Musée d'art moderne (Saint-Étienne)
 * Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Lhasa (prefecture-level city). ALT1 added for purists who don't like use of terms like "picturesque".

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 05:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC).


 * The hook fact is in the first article. The second article is missing a few refs as there are some bare paragraphs. Can it be fixed? Victuallers (talk) 22:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg There is some uncited information in the second paragraph of geography, as well as both the economy and largest communes sections. Miyagawa (talk) 19:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I have added references for the two main uncited paragraphs. As for the largest communes, that information was in the article before I expanded it. My enthusiasm for finding a source or sources for the population of the communes is aproximately nil, but I will remove the information if you want (I think that would be a pity). Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * For the purposes of DYK, the information either needs to be cited or not there. Miyagawa (talk) 19:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, it's gone. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Ok, both articles meet the size and expansion requirements and are now fully cited. Spot checks reveal no copy-vio issues. Images all have appropriate licences. Good to go. Miyagawa (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)