Template:Did you know nominations/Velodona

Velodona

 * ... that the octopus Velodona togata (pictured) was named for the large, distinctive membranes on its arms?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Asahel Gridley
 * Comment: MAIN PAGE SCHEDULERS: The image is set to be the picture of the day on February 4, 2014, so this should not be run on the same day. Image changed.

5x expanded by Sven Manguard (talk). Self nominated at 02:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Amazing job! This article appears to meet all of the criteria for a DYK? nomination right now. Thus, I'd say that it is currently good to go! :) Futurist110 (talk) 03:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg  Futurist, this does not qualify as a QPQ for you per DYK review instructions please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed. — Maile  (talk) 13:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What does that mean for my DYK? Is it still going to run?  S ven M anguard   Wha?  17:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Ping did not show up in my Notifications. Well, it mostly means Fururist110 can't use this as a QPQ because lack of specifics in their "review" doesn't really tell us anything was reviewed.  You have, perhaps, seen this same type of message on various DYKs the last few weeks.  And not just by me, but people trying to cut down the chances of something being pulled from the main page because of...whatever...I hadn't planned on doing this review myself.  But in your spot, I believe I would be asking the same question— Maile  (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: If the suggested pic is scheduled to be POTD only a few short weeks away, we should not use the same pic on DYK now. If we are using this pic on DYK, maybe the POTD date can be delayed? I don't think we should use the same pic on MainPage twice within a short time. It's better to let another pic get the exposure on MainPage. --PFHLai (talk) 12:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC) I've started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know about this issue. --PFHLai (talk) 13:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * PFHLai: There was a second illustration (which I actually find more useful than the FP). I've swapped out the FP in favor of this one. There should be no issues now.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  17:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

The following has been checked in this review by Maile
 * DYK Check confirms "Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 14 edits ago on January 17, 2014" and has 5526 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
 * Every paragraph sourced
 * Hook is stated in the article and sourced
 * Duplication Detector run on each of the 6 sources and showed no copyvio issues
 * Image is in the article and sourced on Commons as Public Domain
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Good 2 go. — Maile (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)