Template:Did you know nominations/Vidal Llerenas Morales


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vanamonde (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Vidal Llerenas Morales

 * ... that while in the Legislative Assembly of the Federal District, Vidal Llerenas Morales presented several initiatives supporting the legalization of marijuana in Mexico City?
 * ALT1 ... that while in the Legislative Assembly of the Federal District, Vidal Llerenas Morales presented several initiatives supporting the legalization of marijuana?
 * Reviewed: IWRG Caravana de Campeones
 * Comment: (2 of 10)

5x expanded by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 07:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC).

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg No issues found with article, ready for human review.
 * &#x2713; This biographical article has been expanded from 285 chars to 2776 chars since 08:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC), a 9.74-fold expansion
 * &#x2713; This article meets the DYK criteria at 2776 characters
 * &#x2713; All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
 * Note that this is a biographical article about a living person. All claims must be cited to a reliable source.
 * &#x2713; This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
 * &#x2713; A copyright violation is unlikely (1.0% confidence; confirm)
 * Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
 * Symbol question.svg Some overall issues detected
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 129 characters
 * &#x2717; Raymie has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.
 * &#x2717; Template:Did you know nominations/IWRG Caravana de Campeones appears to have been used as QPQ for Template:Did you know nominations/Jericó Abramo Masso, Template:Did you know nominations/Vidal Llerenas Morales, Template:Did you know nominations/Arturo Santana Alfaro, Template:Did you know nominations/Ana María Boone Godoy, Template:Did you know nominations/Yulma Rocha Aguilar, Template:Did you know nominations/Alfredo Bejos Nicolás, Template:Did you know nominations/Raúl Domínguez Rex, Template:Did you know nominations/Tomás Ruiz González, Template:Did you know nominations/Sandra Méndez Hernández, Template:Did you know nominations/Pablo Bedolla López Multinom OK.  Intelligent  sium  23:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * - I am going to start the DYK review, but before I read any further I would suggest that the acronym is spelled out, it's not a commonly known acronym and usually they're only used after being defined. Text would still be under 200 characters long but a lot more relatable.  MPJ  -DK 00:30, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg I can confirm the bot's findings on age, length, direct copyvios to English language texts etc. But I am failing to see where the cited source actually supports the hook that has been put forth? Using my built in chrome browser translator I do not see any legislation around Marijunana legalization, I don't see any "Political initiatives" at all, it just lists his roles - not his accomplishments or anything of the like. The current hook is not supported by the source provided, can you please address this problem or suggest an alternate hook that is supported by the sorces.  MPJ  -DK 00:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Somehow I managed to cite the wrong source there. It's the SDP Noticias one that mentions it, not the SIL (I think my muscle memory for has gotten to me). I've also expanded the acronym at your suggestion. Raymie (t • c) 18:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * - that makes more sense. Looking at the hook, the term "Supporting" is indeed covered by the source - but the article does not actually state what is in the hook, the article says "related to" but does not state pro or con. Not sure exactly how you would want to word it, but once that's addressed I believe it can be passed.  MPJ  -DK 18:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I just tweaked the article to match. Raymie (t • c) 19:00, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg - yep good to go now. Note to anyone prepping or moving this who may not know but "Mexico City" and the "Federal District" is the same thing these days pre WW II (I think) it was different but today the terms are interchangable really.  MPJ  -DK 19:30, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm promoting this now because most things check out, except for the "in Mexico city" part of the hook which is not supported by the source. Since the rest of the article is okay, I'm removing that fragment from article and hook (which was a little wordy anyhow) and promoting it. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)