Template:Did you know nominations/Vultum Dei quaerere


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:14, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Vultum Dei quaerere

 * ... that Pope Francis' apostolic constitution Vultum Dei quaerere amended Catholic canon law pertaining to women's contemplative life?



Created by Jujutsuan (talk). Self-nominated at 18:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC).

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Some issues found.
 * &#x2713; This article is new and was created on 17:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * &#x2717; This article is too short at 1455 characters (the DYK minimum is 1500 characters)
 * &#x2717; Paragraphs [4] (During ... that) in this article lack a citation.
 * &#x2713; This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
 * ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 42.5% confidence. (confirm)
 * Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
 * No overall issues detected
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 126 characters
 * &#x2713; Jujutsuan has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 1 more DYKs.
 * Bot miscounted characters; there are nearly 1,900. Also the citation ¶4 is attached to the block quotation. juju  ( hajime!  &#124;  waza ) 23:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Just a quick note: The character count doesn't include block quotes, headers etc. (per Did you know/Supplementary guidelines), so the bot is correct.  Don't think it will be too much of a problem to add fifty characters though? - Dumelow (talk) 17:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, forgot it ignores block quotes. I believe I've resolved the issue now. juju ( hajime!  &#124;  waza ) 23:42, 25 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed by human reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg New enough and just long enough. The hook is interesting, in the article and backed up by the source. No QPQ needed and no issues I can see. Good to go. Raymie (t • c) 03:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but I don't see anything about "amending" canon law in the article or source. I see that it proposed new rules, and that it "repealed" laws that contradict it, but not that it amends existing law. Yoninah (talk) 22:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * To partially repeal is to amend. It is appropriate a fortiori then to say that canon law is "amended". It would be unreasonable to require a source to use the precise word to use it in the hook. juju ( hajime!  &#124;  waza ) 18:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg OK, thanks. Restoring tick per Raymie's review. Yoninah (talk) 20:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)