Template:Did you know nominations/Wahhabi sack of Karbala


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Wahhabi sack of Karbala

 * ... that after 12,000 Wahhabis from the first Saudi State sacked the city of Karabala and killed 2,000–5,000 people, they left the city with 4,000 camels carrying their plunder?


 * ALT1:... that approximately 12,000 Wahhabis from the first Saudi State sacked the city of Karabala about 214 years ago and killed 2000–5000 people?
 * Reviewed: TEDES

Created/expanded by Mhhossein (talk). Self-nominated at 04:44, 13 August 2016 (UTC).


 * Comment I don't think it is reasonable to use "Saudi Arabia", when the country didn't exist until 1932. Perhaps something like "present-day Saudi Arabia" or "what is now Saudi Arabia". Edwardx (talk) 10:38, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Edwardx: Thanks for your comment. I agree with you and I had to be more careful about it. How about using "First Saudi State"? Mhhossein (talk) 11:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg No issues found with article, ready for human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * &#x2713; This article has been expanded from 630 chars to 3742 chars since 05:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC), a 5.94-fold expansion
 * &#x2713; This article meets the DYK criteria at 3742 characters
 * &#x2713; All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
 * &#x2713; This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
 * ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 46.5% confidence. (confirm)
 * Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
 * Symbol question.svg Some overall issues detected
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 169 characters
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 134 characters
 * &#x2717; Mhhossein has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.
 * Thank you, Mhhossein. That seems much better, but I'm no expert in Saudi history! Edwardx (talk) 12:19, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Length, history and reference verified. I like the original hook better. Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)