Template:Did you know nominations/Warwickslade Cutting Railway


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 10:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Warwickslade Cutting Railway

 * ... that the Warwickslade Cutting Railway was assembled from prefabricated rail sections with pin to tube joints, like those of a toy railway?



Created/expanded by NearEMPTiness (talk). Self-nominated at 05:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC).


 * ✅ New enough, long enough, neutral, well-sourced, and only close paraphrasings are with text released under a Creative Common licence (see ).
 * ✅ Hook short enough, interesting, correct, cited, and neutral
 * ✅ QPQ not done QPQ not required, because it is just the third nomination
 * ✅ Photo is fine
 * You don't appear to have reviewed another DYK nomination, which is required? Please can you do so and then put a link to that DYK nomination here. Once that is done, I'm happy to pass this nomination. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for reviewing my nominaton. I fully endorse the need for QPQ, but I had thought that "people who have made fewer than five DYK nominations, are not required to do another review." Therefore, I would be pleased, if you wave it through without QPQ, because this is just my fourth nomination. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Confirm they are exempt, as it's their third nomination. I pass this article. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)