Template:Did you know nominations/Wheat production in the United States

Wheat production in the United States

 * ... that annual wheat production (example pictured) in the United States more than tripled in the 50 years between 1871 and 1921?

Created by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Dr. Blofeld (talk) at 12:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC).



Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Premio Lo Nuestro 1997
 * -- Tito ☸ Dutta 23:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, which sources are supporting 1, 3 and 4 here Wheat_production_in_the_United_States? -- Tito Dutta 13:34, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry about the delay. I lost the file in which I had the text and references of the article. I have now found the relevant references and fixed them. I have also added an alternate img. May approve any one of them-- Nvvchar . 04:12, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review of nomination needed, including sourcing issues raised earlier (and presumably addressed), and whether the QPQ listed is valid, as it doesn't appear to be a full review. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:59, 2 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg Both images are public domain, free to use on the Main page. The hook fact is exactly confirmed by a book which is viewable on Google Books. The Duplication Detector tool found one significant instance of copying text, with the article's "genetically modified wheat not approved for cultivation anywhere in the world" being too close to the copyrighted Reuter source's "Genetically modified wheat is still not approved for cultivation anywhere in the world." Binksternet (talk) 15:20, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I remember reading that statement in Reuters and then a couple of other sources and thinking, "I've stumbled onto something important here". I think the Reuter's sentence fragment is important enough as is not to try and wordsmith it and get it wrong, so I've re-written the sentence quoting Reuters. I also moved the Reuters ref to the end of the sentence. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm suggesting ALT1 as I don't think we need to wl the US. I prefer the 2nd img but it'll be up to the reviewer to make that decision. ALT1: ... that annual wheat production in the United States (example pictured) more than tripled in the 50 years between 1871 and 1921? --Rosiestep (talk) 15:55, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ALT2: ... that a mystery surrounds the finding of genetically modified wheat being produced on a US wheat farm in Spring 2013? --Rosiestep (talk) 16:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Good work on changing the text to a quote. ALT1 works as well as the original, but ALT2 is not supported by a specific photo. It could run without a photo. On that note, the parenthetical (pictured) should probably say "example pictured" so that the viewer does not think he is looking at the annual US production, all of it. One more little problem I noticed is that the "Environmental aspects" section's first paragraph has no references at all. There must be at least one reference to meet DYK rules. Binksternet (talk) 16:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I fixed the unreferenced paragraph issue. I changed the original hook and ALT1 to say "example pictured" and removed "pictured" from ALT2. I think a picture improves a hook so I'd suggest using one of those hooks, but that'll be up to you (or another reviewer) to decide. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:14, 3 July 2013 (UTC)


 * May I suggest using another image as the one we are using now appears to be straw rather than wheat. I therefore suggest Wheat harvest.jpg--Ipigott (talk) 11:22, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg This DYK nomination is good to go with either ALT1 and the third image (as my personal preference), or ALT2 with no image at all, because we have no photo to fit the ALT2 hook. Binksternet (talk) 21:41, 7 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Binksternet, we support your preference. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:21, 8 July 2013 (UTC)