Template:Did you know nominations/Wildlife of Sweden


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Wildlife of Sweden

 * ... that the wildlife of Sweden is likely to be affected by global warming, with the tree line moving to higher altitudes and forests replacing tundra? Source: "The treeline is expected to move northward and to higher elevations, with forests replacing a significant fraction of existing tundra"
 * Reviewed: Juan Carlos de la Cruz Reyna

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 09:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Article is new enough, long enough, and well referenced. Hook is interesting and verified with inline reference. QPQ is done. The only issue is that Earwig reports high probability of copyvio with two websites: and, mainly for text in the "Climate" section copied from Sweden. I'm not sure whether that's a case of reverse copying, but it needs to be investigated. -Zanhe (talk) 02:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. The "Climate" section of the Sweden article has been there since the dawn of time, but rather than investigate the copyvio status fully, I have chosen to rewrite the climate section in this article. It should be OK now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Yeah, the most likely scenario is the two websites copied the info from Wikipedia without attribution. And thanks for the rewrite. This is now good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)