Template:Did you know nominations/Women's Premiership


 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Women's Premiership, Bristol Ladies, Darlington Mowden Park Sharks, Lichfield Ladies, Richmond Women, Saracens Women, Wasps Ladies, Worcester Ladies, Aylesford Bulls Ladies, Thurrock T-Birds

 * ... that the Women's Premiership is currently comprised of Bristol Ladies, Darlington Mowden Park Sharks, Lichfield Ladies, Richmond Women, Saracens Women, Wasps Ladies, Worcester Ladies and Aylesford Bulls Ladies, after having defeated Thurrock T-Birds in a playoff?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/.cz, Template:Did you know nominations/Nelson Mandela, Template:Did you know nominations/Frederick G. Coan, Template:Did you know nominations/Edwin St Hill, Template:Did you know nominations/Toy Story 3, Template:Did you know nominations/Janet King (fictional character), Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Fourth Wave Feminism, Template:Did you know nominations/Sacarello's, Template:Did you know nominations/Mangulam, Template:Did you know nominations/D'Oliveira affair

Created by The C of E (talk). Self nominated at 22:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC).


 * For those who count, this is a 10-hook nomination. — Maile (talk) 13:36, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Confirming that all 10 QPQs were done satisfactorily. — Maile  (talk) 14:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Reviewing.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 9 articles created on February 28 and 1 expanded on that date.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * All articles long enough.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Women's Premiership needs to name all the teams mentioned in this hook at Women's Premiership with a WP:IC.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * "associated to" -> associated with.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * link Promotion and relegation--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * consider finding an infobox for this league.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Please move the citation from the section heading to the prose. (You will need to add an introductory sentence to the section.)--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Bristol Ladies, Darlington Mowden Park Sharks, Lichfield Ladies, Saracens Women, Worcester Ladies, Aylesford Bulls Ladies O.K. (Prose adequate, MOS OK, spot copyvio is O.K.)--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:01, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Tony, if you want QPQ credit for these reviews, you'll need more than "O.K." Please specify what you've checked for each article, like hook fact sourcing, neutrality, general sourcing, close paraphrasing, etc. (I see you've already mentioned newness and length for all of them.) Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC) Added Note: moved this comment back to where it was originally placed; at the time, there were first three teams only listed and just the first "O.K." 20:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Nothing in the prose at Richmond Women's WP:IC for this hook says what league the team plays in.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:15, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Citation should follow punctuation when possible (as in this case).--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * IC continues to omit support for fact.--15:40, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Can you quote prose that says they played in the premier league.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * "They were founded in 1986 and play in the Women's Premiership." It has a BT and RFU source that proves it.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 21:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Neither BT nor RFU offers the quote that you mentioned.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I thought you meant in the article. The BT source says "Richmond are probably the biggest threat to their crown, given the addition of Watmore to their already packed list of top internationals," Also the RFU source has that sidebar which lists all the teams in the Premiership.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 08:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Are you familiar with WP:V?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 09:38, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I found a BBC source.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 08:45, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * .--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:16, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Wasps Ladies could use a better ref.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Ryding 2 Health Magazine is not a very strong WP:RS. Find a better one.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The ref does not really say that they play in the Premiere league.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes it does. The RFU source clearly lists them as a Premiership club.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 21:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Please quote me where this is clearly stated in the source.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The RFU source has that sidebar that says who plays in the Premiership and it includes Wasps.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 08:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If you can't come up with anything else, that will do, but can you come up with something more WP:V.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 09:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I have found a BBC source.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 08:45, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Can you quote the prose from that article that makes their membership in this league clear to the reader?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * It is in that small box on the side of the article but I have found another source which says "There were wins for Wasps, Richmond, Bristol and Worcester in round one of the English Women's Premiership with some exciting rugby on display."  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 08:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thurrock T-Birds has a WP:IC in the main body but not in the WP:LEAD. The LEAD must either be fully cited or fully uncited with all main body content cited. Half cited and half uncited is unacceptable.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Done those but I'm unclear as to what you mean on the Wasps one.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 13:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Done those.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 18:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:58, 11 March 2014 (UTC)