Template:Did you know nominations/Worcestershire v Somerset, 1979


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Worcestershire v Somerset, 1979

 * ... that in 1979, Somerset deliberately lost a cricket match in 18 minutes? Source:
 * Comment: QPQ pending

Moved to mainspace by Harrias (talk). Self-nominated at 23:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Article is new, long enough, and doesn't throw up any red flags for plagiarism, neutrality or sourcing. Hook is interesting (even to someone who knows little about the sport), short and cited inline. Just need that QPQ.  Sounder Bruce  02:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry it's taken me a while, forgot about this! QPQ done: Template:Did you know nominations/List of Kolpak cricketers. Harrias  talk 20:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for getting it done, though I didn't get the notification from that ping. Symbol confirmed.svg Approved and ready to go.  Sounder Bruce  17:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Oops, that was probably because I forgot to sign my comment! Thanks for the review. Harrias  talk 20:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but was wondering if you could add at least one cite to each of the charts? Where did you get this information from? Also, the last paragraph under "Reaction and aftermath" lacks at least one cite, per Rule D2. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Done the charts, just need to get that final line done. Bug me if I forget. Harrias  talk 23:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * All added. Harrias  talk 07:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Thanks for adding the cites. No close paraphrasing seen in new cites. Restoring tick per SounderBruce's review. Yoninah (talk) 08:12, 18 May 2017 (UTC)