Template:Did you know nominations/World Enough and Time


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw (talk) 20:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

World Enough and Time

 * ... that "World Enough and Time", an episode of the fan production Star Trek: New Voyages, was nominated for both a Hugo Award and a Nebula Award, competing against professionally made episodes?


 * ALT1:... that Joss Whedon said that "World Enough and Time", an episode of the fan production Star Trek: New Voyages, was "probably the best episode of the original Star Trek I'd ever seen"?
 * Reviewed: Commission Directive 91/71/EEC
 * Comment: With all the Star Trek love on the 8th, I don't expect to see this actually appear on the front page for some time. I wouldn't have written it, but I came across a host of production information all at once.

Created by Miyagawa (talk). Self-nominated at 16:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC).

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 16:29, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * &#x2713; This article is new and was created on 22:00, 03 September 2016 (UTC)
 * &#x2713; This article meets the DYK criteria at 17177 characters
 * &#x2713; All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
 * &#x2713; This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
 * ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 54.3% confidence. (confirm)
 * Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 172 characters
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 177 characters
 * &#x2713; Miyagawa has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/EEC was performed for this nomination.
 * Just to note, the copyvio problem picked up by the bot are quotes from reviewers. Miyagawa (talk) 17:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Well, I've just gone through it and reviewed it. I verify the bot's findings above. I also verify that what the Earwig tool sees as copyvio are quotes, proper names and things like "a premiere in Beverly Hills". Additional spot check with Labs Dup Detector seems OK. Checklinks shows all external links are clean. Dab solver says there are no dabs in the article. I would say it would be helpful if ALT1 said who Joss Whedon is, but you can't define him with one or two words. I got an unexpected laugh from the Controversy section. Any Wikipedian who has seen enough self published sources discounted will see a similar perspective in this section. This passes. — Maile (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)