Template:Did you know nominations/Xylolaemus sakhnovi


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 17:31, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Xylolaemus sakhnovi

 * ... that Xylolaemus sakhnovi was the first of its genus described from the fossil record?


 * Reviewed: Scapteriscus borellii
 * Comment: reviewed Scapteriscus vicinus of the Scapteriscus borellii nom

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 23:42, 14 June 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg New enough, QPQ, long enough, and since the main sources are not online, I will have to rely on good faith that the article does not infringe on their copyright. The hook is fine, except that I do not see that fact in the article (and read it several times to be certain). Could you please explicitly state where the hook fact is mentioned in the article? AHeneen (talk) 21:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The hook fact does not seem to be in the article, and what does "electromexicus" to do with this beetle? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:22, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the late response! I have removed electromexicus and replaced it with the correct species epithet, sakhnovi.  I have also added the hook fact into the article, cited to the type description paper.-- Kev  min  § 17:41, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg AHeneen (talk) 21:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)