Template:Did you know nominations/Zofia Daszyńska-Golińska


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw (talk) 05:35, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Zofia Daszyńska-Golińska

 * ... that Prof. Zofia Daszyńska-Golińska (pictured) taught at Warsaw's Flying University before she became a Polish senator?
 * ALT1: ... that Prof. Daszyńska-Golińska (pictured) taught economics at the Flying University in Warsaw?
 * Reviewed: QPQ=Gesche Schünemann

Created by Victuallers (talk). Self nominated at 15:53, 4 April 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol voting keep.svg We're running low on biographies for the prep areas, so I'll be doing a few now (I wonder if I can bank DYK QPQs?). Anyways: The article is new, circa April 4, long enough, neutral, properly cited, and has a QPQ. I am going to have to go AGF on paraphrasing, because I don't have access to the books and I don't read Polish. The hooks are fine in length, and backed by citations. The image is used in the article, and properly licensed. This is good to go.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  19:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't we remove Prof. and/or replace it with regular professor? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:23, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I lean towards agreeing with you, but I don't mind either way. I'll leave it to whomever promotes this to decide.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  06:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Propose the following, remove honorific altogether per WP:HONORIFIC,  Montanabw (talk) 01:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * ALT2: ...that Zofia Daszyńska-Golińska (pictured) taught at Warsaw's Flying University before she became a Polish senator?
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Yes, that still works.   S ven M anguard   Wha?  01:34, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Can I promote this one given that I suggested an alt hook that the primary reviewer accepted or do we need yet ANOTHER person to promote this one??  Montanabw (talk) 02:33, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh my god, the bureaucracy is soul-crushing. The way I see it, you didn't propose a new hook, you proposed a minor change to an accepted hook - a fix you could have made during promotion under the DYK rules - an therefore you don't need to have someone else look at it. Apparently, having a second pair of eyes before promotion is only requested/required if you're making substantive conceptual changes in hook proposals.   S ven M anguard   Wha?  04:20, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, I'll promote it, then and see what happens. Brace for impace!   Montanabw (talk) 05:35, 12 April 2014 (UTC)