Template:Did you know nominations/sexuality after spinal cord injury


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Sexuality after spinal cord injury

 * ... that while sexuality after spinal cord injury is often disrupted, half of people with spinal cord injury can still achieve orgasm?


 * Comment: Is this too R rated for the main page? I can try to find a fact that doesn't mention orgasm.  The hook logically follows from two sources: "half of men with SCI still experience orgasm" and "Half of women with spinal cord injury are able to reach orgasm" sourced inline.
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Wilhelm Boden
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Wilhelm Boden

Moved to mainspace by Delldot (talk). Self-nominated at 22:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article is new enough (moved to mainspace 1 day ago), long enough (10K+ characters), neutral, cites sources, with no detectable copyvio. Hook is short enough, cited, neutral, and interesting. QPQ completed. Both parts of the hook appear in the same article and parapgraph here. Personally, if this can be TFA, I’m not too concerned. --Godot13 (talk) 02:01, 11 October 2015 (UTC)