Template talk:10 deadliest US tornadoes

Keep it just in the Top 10
If I may suggest, we should just keep the list for the Top 10 tornadoes (not the top 15, 20 or 25). Just keep the list simple.--Halls4521 (talk) 02:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I 100% agree. There is no reason to expand this list, as we already have 25 deadliest US tornadoes. Whether or not people think both these lists exist is up for debate (I think they both have value, as it cuts down on clutter on the top-10 pages), but I think keeping this 10 should be a no-brainer.- Running On Brains (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I have moved it back to the old format/location.- Running On Brains (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Well...I expanded it so that it would contain more information. I think it could probably be formatted a bit better though. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:00, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * But that information is already contained elsewhere is my point. Either we should keep both or we should redirect to 25 deadliest US tornadoes. - Running On Brains (talk) 06:42, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I redirected the 25 one here since it wasn't as developed as this one. I didn't realize the 25 one existed until after I expanded this one. This one, when I expanded it, was also better than the other one as it had one more correct link and no formatting issues. We shouldn't have redundant templates so one or the other has to be kept and I would prefer that the maximum number of facts be included since it wouldn't really hurt to be that precise. Besides, it will also increase the likelihood that the pages will be created that aren't there as well as increase traffic between pages, which will help build underdeveloped ones over time. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 15:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)