Template talk:Arbitration enforcement appeal

Unclear where this template should be used
Currently says "..please copy the text below to the appropriate forum". I suggest something like // ...please copy the text below to the forum where arbitration was made, e.g., Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement // ... talknic (talk) 05:05, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 6 December 2018
I wish to submit an appeal against an arbcom decision. Can the template be unlocked so I may do so?

Thank you.

SonofSetanta (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2018 (UTC) SonofSetanta (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2018 (UTC)


 * You don't need to edit the template to appeal. You need to use (invoke) the template in the appropriate forum and fill it out to make your appeal.  Sandstein   16:25, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 28 March 2019
Please replace

with

so that it is clear, when looking at the template, that both the signature and the time are automatically added. See the current sandbox version for the result.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 23:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * anyone that can make sense of the later should be able to make sense of the former. Feel free to discuss further below. —  xaosflux  Talk 00:43, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Pasdecomplot appeal to sanction, 29 June 2020
Hi. For some reason, the appeal title topic "Pasdecomplot Sanction" is missing all the text. The next topic on the list, "Arbitration...." is missing an appellate name but has the text from "Pasdecomplot Sanction". Could the text please be cut and pasted to its intended location at "Pasdecomplot Sanction"?

I received an error warning after 'publish changes', about a sessions time-out. This might be the cause of the problem. Thanks very much.Pasdecomplot (talk) 20:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC) Pasdecomplot (talk) 20:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * ❌. You are not expected to edit the template. You are supposed to copy the text and fill in the blanks, per Template:Arbitration_enforcement_appeal. El_C 21:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

According to Arbitration Committee/Procedures: "For a request to succeed, either (i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or (ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA is required". There is also something similar in the contentious topics section of the procedures. ARCA has its own templates, but this template, which is apparently for both AE and AN, just has "clear and substantial consensus of uninvolved administrators" and "section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators", nothing about "uninvolved editors at AN". Is AN still used for appeals? If it is, should the template be modified to reflect this when used there? Peter James (talk) 15:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)