Template talk:BRFAA


 * Approved 15:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC) (bot has flag )

Needs fix
I'm no template guru, so I didn't want to mess around with this. The last part does not correctly handle bots with a space in their username, and does not link to that bot's makebot log. That part is entirely redundant anyway with the earlier part. The only reason we bcrats used to use that wording was because the flag log wasn't already in the template, so we linked to it manually. the last part should probably be removed in the case that it is just another link to the makebot flag log. Now the only time a note is needed is if the bot will run without a flag or already has one. Thanks all. - Taxman Talk 18:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed the URL issue. Not entirely sure which bit you're referring to vis the redundancy. Happy‑melon 14:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that's great. What I mean is for most if them "(bot has flag [1])" is entirely redundant with link to the bots flag log that is already in the botlinks template. Does that make sense? If I'm not being clear, in the example above click on the flag log link and the URL link you just fixed. We used to hand type out something along the lines of "bot has flag" to let everybody know and have a link before the botlinks template was around or had the flag log in it. Now we don't need that if the flag log link is there. The only time a comment is needed now is if something different occurs like not needing a flag. - Taxman Talk 15:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Merge into template:BRFA
This ought to be merged with template:BRFA, the one letter difference is tripping up BAG members who are almost following the instructions at User:SQL/How to close a BRFA Josh Parris 01:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)