Template talk:Bad article

Point of this template?
The template is tagged as humorous but seems to have little purpose, rather it is used in vandalism or mistaken for a legitimate maintenance template. Is there any point in having this template currently? IceWelder &#91; &#9993; &#93; 18:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


 * blegh. thought there would be humor value here, but it doesn't seem to be too useful. no objection to deletion (although i dunno if it's G7 eligible because it has existing transclusions). theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)