Template talk:Beijing

Sections?
What is the middle section, and why is it alphabetized separately from the top section? Badagnani 05:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Scope and groups
There's a fuzzy line between Culture and sights and Visitor attractions. Thoughts?

As for education group, I think it's fine to include several of the top universities. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

The template is horribly disjointed. If we're actually going to have a Culture and sights section on the template, it is not only incomplete (as listed as it is now) and randomly listed (orchestras and a bridge), the sights are already covered under the Visitor attractions (List of landmarks i.e.), which are also listed. There is too much duplication on this template. The Education section for example, all of these universities' links are already covered in the List of universities article. It is highly redundant.--Sevilledade (talk) 22:35, 7 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I like your work on culture/visitor attaractions. But, the universites I think should remain. After all, a navbox is for quick links to hop around. List of uni... is the complete list, but a selection of some universities in the navbox serve visitors, I think. Besides, a group with a single items looks funny, and leaves unoccupied white space. Nothing wrong with a few items there. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:54, 7 October 2012 (UTC)