Template talk:Bots

Syntax
It could have parameters except= or theseones=

e.g.

{nobots|except=werdnabot, RamBot}

or

{nobots|theseones=hangermanBot, smackBot}

Rich Farmbrough, 20:58 12 December 2006 (GMT).

Better idea from Hagerman on template page. Rich Farmbrough, 00:03 18 December 2006 (GMT).

Placement on a page
Where is this tag placed on a page? At the very beginning, or somewhere else? Also, perhaps a stupid question, does the tag need to be placed explicitly on the page that one wants to deny a bot from, or can it being placed on a talk page also affect the bot's parsing of the associated article, or does it have to be placed on each page one wants to deny the bot from parsing? Its position is not explicitly mentioned in WP:SECTIONORDER. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 21:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The placement of the template shouldn't matter as bots will, in general, scan all templates on the page for bots or nobots. Bots will likely not go out of their way to check the associated talk page of an main page and vice versa - only the page they are editing there and then will be checked. Aidan9382 (talk) 09:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Is deny needed, if transclusion is embedded in a tl-series template?
I wasn't sure if the addition of deny=AnomieBOT in this edit at Template:Nth century/doc was necessary. I wanted to make sure the bot didn't subst my examples that run in the Tlg template and show the result; subst'ing them would defeat the purpose. But was it necessary, or does the tlg effectively protect it against transclusion to subst, because the template is now only a param passed to tlg, and not a transclusion of the subst-only template? Mathglot (talk) 22:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * This question would be better asked on the bot's talk page. But, to safe you the trip, it's not necessary (and should be reverted) for the reason you give. Anomie⚔ 22:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 22:50, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Template:Bots/doc
The following is used in the section: and is coded as:. This could be replaced by, which yields the same result. Exclusive Editor Notify Me! 14:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You could wrap it in  tags:
 * Prettier and not so much obfuscation.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 11:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Prettier and not so much obfuscation.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 11:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)