Template talk:BoxRec

Categories
Could the present categorization be replaced with the following one? GregorB (talk) 16:40, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ Happy‑melon 13:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Rename of article
The Wikipedia article Boxrec.com has been moved to BoxRec, therefore  Boxrec  should be replaced by  BoxRec . --Cyfal (talk) 11:57, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

(I've simply edited the talk page a week before, instead of using the button "Submit an edit request" - does this make a difference? Because no one responded so far, I try it again...)

Here is my request: The Wikipedia article Boxrec.com has been moved to BoxRec, therefore in the template  Boxrec  should be replaced by  BoxRec . Otherwise clicking on the second link, in, e.g., "" gots redirected. --Cyfal (talk) 12:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Cyfal (talk) 12:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You don't need to use the "submit an edit request" button but you will need to add editprotected otherwise no one may notice your request. ✅ &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Cyfal, 8 June 2010
Thank you for your explanation, Martin! Could you (or who reads this) still replace Boxrec by BoxRec ? Otherwise it's still a redirect.

Cyfal (talk) 13:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Oops, sorry, I didn't read your request very well. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:39, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

www. in template
BoxRec doesn't use the "www." part of the url, and all boxers records are http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=###&cat=boxer. I think the template would be better if that part were removed. Jfgslo (talk) 19:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 23 December 2015
Please update template's code with the code from sandbox. It mainly includes tracking category addition (for Wikidata support - categories already created) and adding an option to use ID directly from Wikidata. -- Edgars2007  (talk/contribs) 12:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Primefac (talk) 04:31, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

ELNO
Isn't it a violation of WP:ELNO to use this template in the External links section of an article? "Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject, one should generally avoid providing external links to: ... Sites that require payment or registration to view the relevant content, unless the site itself is the subject of the article, or the link is a convenience link to a citation." GA-RT-22 (talk) 00:18, 6 July 2023 (UTC)