Template talk:Bureaucrat note

Why is this template protected, its just an image with two words, templates such as TakeNote and the checkuser templates such as Likely, Possible, unrelated etc are not protected, this is by far high risk..... Rlest 16:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Template:Clerk-note, the template on which this one is based, was protected, so I followed suit. --Deskana (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Mh, I'm still not too convinced; lets leave it here and see what others have to say about it. --Rlest 16:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Given that they were all protected by the same person, and all the others are only sprotected, I have a feeling that Thatcher may have accidentally fully protected clerk-note. I'll reduce this to sprotection. --Deskana (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Pictogram
I'm not fantastically happy with the choice of pictogram. It can either been seen as an "i" or an upside down, Spanish style "!": neither of those are really right. Anyone got any suggestions for replacements? --Dweller (talk) 09:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I see WJB Scribe chose it (edit summary: I presume these will usually be requests for more info?). So it seems it's intended to be an "i", but I think the info is being requested from the recipient, which means it's inappropriate. I know, I'm pedantic. --Dweller (talk) 10:10, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You could replace it with Pictogram voting comment.svg instead.  So Why  10:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I like SoWhy's suggestion. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  15:10, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'd go with that one. Useight (talk) 15:42, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, ✅. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  16:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)