Template talk:COVID-19 pandemic data/Peru medical cases chart

Percentage or absolute option for new infections?
I started a discussion on that topic here Project COVID-19, Medical cases charts - change type. My personal opinion is that absolute change display suits much better in an epidemic's second wave. But also the status quo ante should be kept until some agreement is reached (locally or possibly a consensus in linked discussion). -- Kohraa Mondel (talk) 15:35, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Data Consistency and Layout
The total number of cases is less than the number of recoveries plus the number of deaths! This is technically not possible and also leads to the broken chart. Can someone with a more sound knowledge of the spanish language than mine please review the source? My suspicion is that "recoveries" is rather "non-active cases", including those deceased with corona already. A little explanation on the dates of this post and the answer: I originally put my remarks as a comment at the end of the template data. Pietade removed it here, which all in all is not a bad idea, and I just came around to edit my remarks for the discussion. -- Kohraa Mondel (talk) 06:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Some observations: in FF the layout is tolerable e.g. in ruwi and etwi tables, inserting “barwidth=auto” in this template makes it look normal, yet it occupies the whole width; current (07:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)) weird layout can also be achieved, if one changes font size in FF...&#32;— Pietadè (talk) 07:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)