Template talk:Campaignbox Peninsula Campaign

List structure
To clarify a bit: in semantic terms, the list of the Seven Days' Battles is, indeed, a continuation of the preceding list rather than a separate listing it its own right:

|--  Seven Days' Battles   --| ... Hanover Court House · Seven Pines · Oak Grove · ... · Malvern Hill

The bolding is merely a visual effect, and strictly speaking isn't necessary to indicate the relationship between the items. If I'm not mistaken, the standard nested list format is therefore the appropriate one here. Kirill [talk] [prof] 02:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * No problem. The bolding is just coming from the ambient styling of definition list terms (";"). On British people I used nobold on some DTs. I've also argued for just overriding the bold for all DTs under class=hlist. This is all changing pretty fast, so there's some thrashing. Alarbus (talk) 03:04, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. The new layouts look very nice, but, as you say, any change of this magnitude is going to involve some temporary chaos. Kirill [talk] [prof] 03:07, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks (re the looks). The big test template ATM is The Holocaust; discussed at template talk:navbox. I've a large number of campaign boxes and such watched. I see a lot of people showing up after the hlist switch-over and they seem to find the new format much more approachable and easier to update. This is hitting on several good issues: semantics, reduced server load (millions and millions of {dot} not being preprocessed), and easy of editing. 03:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC)