Template talk:Citationrequired

Requested move 26 April 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Redirected to Citation needed. (closed by non-admin page mover)  SITH   (talk)   17:40, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Template:Citationrequired → ? – Template:Citation required is a redirect to Citation needed, so this should not lead to a different template. No idea on what the name should be. Gonnym (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. DannyS712 (talk) 23:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I have this RM -  without a suggested target there is nothing that can be done --DannyS712 (talk) 23:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Cite edit is probably a good target; it's short, straightforward enough, and is unlikely to be confused with because edit is in the name.  eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 01:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Template:Cite content is probably a better target. QuackGuru ( talk ) 03:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose move and redirect it to Citation needed - Its functionally the same as Template:Uw-unsourced1, so duplicates its function substantially and even could be speedy deleted (WP:T3) on that basis. But for now let's just treat it like Template:Citation required. -- Netoholic @  09:09, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Good find. Support this. --Gonnym (talk) 13:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to citation needed this is redundant to, and has never been used. Danski454 (talk) 10:41, 12 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.